On 4/24/18, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:15:17PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 4/23/18, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: >> > Paul B Mahol (2018-04-23): >> >> It is big threat. >> > >> > Will you please give arguments instead of repeating the same things >> > endlessly? >> > >> > I think I intuitively agree with your position, but as it is, you >> > objection is worthless, and Thilo would be entitled to just ignore it. >> > >> Why would we link to binary blobs that deny REing? > > how could that work ? > LGPL says this: > 6. As an exception to the Sections above, you may also combine or > link a "work that uses the Library" with the Library to produce a > work containing portions of the Library, and distribute that work > under terms of your choice, provided that the terms permit > modification of the work for the customer's own use and reverse > engineering for debugging such modifications. > > [...]
I wonder that too. IIRC they used to have special ffmpeg version with this codec support. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
