On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:15:17PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 4/23/18, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > > Paul B Mahol (2018-04-23): > >> It is big threat. > > > > Will you please give arguments instead of repeating the same things > > endlessly? > > > > I think I intuitively agree with your position, but as it is, you > > objection is worthless, and Thilo would be entitled to just ignore it. >
> Why would we link to binary blobs that deny REing?
how could that work ?
LGPL says this:
6. As an exception to the Sections above, you may also combine or
link a "work that uses the Library" with the Library to produce a
work containing portions of the Library, and distribute that work
under terms of your choice, provided that the terms permit
modification of the work for the customer's own use and reverse
engineering for debugging such modifications.
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
It is what and why we do it that matters, not just one of them.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
