On 10/4/2016 10:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> This "break" may actually be more correct output, but I am not familiar >> enough >> with lavfi or vf_fps to say. Removing the last frame in case where it should >> have >> been removed was the entire point of this patch. > > the change to fate is wrong > the input has a timebase of 1/3000, all timestamps are multiplies of > 100 its thus basically 30 fps (with skiped frames) and the used > -vf fps=30 should restore skip frames to make it cfr, loosing the last > frame entirely is wrong in this case
I think you are correct. However, I'm not exactly sure of the proper way to fix this. Not without more thought... - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
