On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 02:30:20PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc > > wrote: > > > It could be reverted, it could be left for the next developer to use > > as starting point, i have no oppinion on this. > > > So, I want to comment on this specifically: I don't think it can. > > I don't specifically mean that it's too slow, although that's a reason by > itself. The _specific_ reason I don't think it should be used as a basis > for really anything is that we _do not know what it does_. We don't know if > it uses simd instructions for the scalar operants (+=, *=, etc.) and there > is no way for us to verify other than actually understanding the complete > problem space.
If you want to revert the patch, please revert the patch Thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. -- George Orwell
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
