Hi, On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 07:28:27AM -0500, Dan Parrot wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 09:07 +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > [...] > > > > > One other thing: why didn't this come up when the earlier patch was > > submitted and applied? > > community patch review is not a reproduceable process, depending on > who has time and does the review, different things can be found and > pointed out, and people have also different oppinions. > Real consistency can possibly only be achived by having an active > maintainer that does all review ... > > To be more precisse the other patch was applied due to this comment > IIRC: > "If this patch works (FATE passes on ppc64) and is faster than > the plain c functions then it can be committed as is" How much faster was it? And how does that compare to typical sse2 x86 speedups vs. c? Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
