On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/26/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote: >> Muhammad Faiz <mfcc64 <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >>> I think it's not because of bit-exact problem. >>> But because fate probes supported formats (with >>> libavfilter/tests/filtfmts) >>> On BE machine, code with native formats will generate error >>> because fate-ref contains yuv*le entries but fate expects yuv*be >> >> We control the fate test, so we can require an additional >> (bit-exact) conversion from BE to LE to make the fate >> test pass. > > Really, even for pixfmts? > > I will apply this as is. Feel free to add your hacks if you want, after.
You force a conversion before your filter now for everyone on BE, the alternative is to make fate force a conversion after your filter and only for fate (same conversion, just at a different point in the filter graph) Most high-bitdepth tests already do this, simply by requesting a defined pixfmt in the fate test. Clearly less forced conversions is better? - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
