On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/25/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote: >> Paul B Mahol <onemda <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >>> >>+ AV_PIX_FMT_YUV420P9LE, AV_PIX_FMT_YUVA420P9LE, >>> > >>> > Why not use native endian format? >>> >>> Because of fate test. >> >> Isn't the byte-swapping (that could be used for the >> fate test) bit-exact? Or do I miss something? > > What? There is bilinear option that have nothing to do with byte swapping. >
I think it's not because of bit-exact problem. But because fate probes supported formats (with libavfilter/tests/filtfmts) On BE machine, code with native formats will generate error because fate-ref contains yuv*le entries but fate expects yuv*be Thank's _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
