On 6/26/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote: > Muhammad Faiz <mfcc64 <at> gmail.com> writes: > >> I think it's not because of bit-exact problem. >> But because fate probes supported formats (with >> libavfilter/tests/filtfmts) >> On BE machine, code with native formats will generate error >> because fate-ref contains yuv*le entries but fate expects yuv*be > > We control the fate test, so we can require an additional > (bit-exact) conversion from BE to LE to make the fate > test pass.
Really, even for pixfmts? I will apply this as is. Feel free to add your hacks if you want, after. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
