Am 28.03.16 um 12:14 schrieb Hendrik Leppkes: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: >> >>> People that don't speak up at all may approve silently (or at least >>> not disapprove), someone that raised issues should give an explicit >>> OK/Nevermind/whatever, agreeing with you or withdrawing his >>> complaints, there is no "silent" option there. >> >> >> This seems unreasonable, beacuse this way a silent person can block a patch >> forever, which is not optimal. >> >> What I usually do is after a week of silence if I feel that I addressed the >> concerns, or there is no known way to improve the patch, I send one last >> ping explicitly stating that I will apply the patch soon. (whithin 1-2 >> days). And if the silence remains, I apply it. >> > > If you send a mail explicitly stating that and the intention to move > forward if no further feedback arrives, then its usually fine. Didn't > happen here though.
"ping": http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/211969 "don't like": http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/211970 "what to do?": http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/211971 -silence- Ok, or not, whatever. My actions were not ideal either and I regret it. In the future I will be more sensible for pending people. And maybe wm4 might consider not to wait for others to squeeze his concerns out of him. I don't see any actions in bad faith. Let's go back to work everyone, please. -Thilo _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
