On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:05:10 +0200 (CEST) Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > > > People that don't speak up at all may approve silently (or at least > > not disapprove), someone that raised issues should give an explicit > > OK/Nevermind/whatever, agreeing with you or withdrawing his > > complaints, there is no "silent" option there. > > This seems unreasonable, beacuse this way a silent person can block a > patch forever, which is not optimal. > > What I usually do is after a week of silence if I feel that I addressed > the concerns, or there is no known way to improve the patch, I send > one last ping explicitly stating that I will apply the patch soon. > (whithin 1-2 days). And if the silence remains, I apply it. > In any case I agree that my behavior wasn't ideal. I was thinking more along the lines that I didn't really care, but someone really should have cared. I didn't want this issue to be overlooked at least. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
