On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:21:11PM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Michael Niedermayer > <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:24:36AM +0000, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >> Kieran Kunhya <kieran <at> kunhya.com> writes: > >> > >> > The internal encoder is superior to libvo-aacenc. > >> > >> I thought this was the case for several years? > >> > >> Needs a Changelog entry and a news entry together with > >> libaacplus. > > > > how does the speed of all the aac encoders compare ? > > we should keep the fastest and the one havng best quality per bit > > (assuming thats a single one and not multiple due to different behavior > > at different bitrates) > > > > also it may make sense to keep activly developed encoders so users and > > develoeprs can continue to test/compare and use them in case they > > improve > > > > > libvo-aacenc is a dump from an earlier Android build. Android has > since switched to fdk-aac and libvo-aacenc is just dead. > So from that perspective, there is definitely nothing lost. > > Can't judge the speed, but libvo-aacenc has the worst quality of all > aac lc encoders we had, so I doubt anyone is going to miss it.
i didnt suggest to keep it, i mean it more in general [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The misfortune of the wise is better than the prosperity of the fool. -- Epicurus
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
