On 1/25/16, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Michael Niedermayer > <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:24:36AM +0000, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>> Kieran Kunhya <kieran <at> kunhya.com> writes: >>> >>> > The internal encoder is superior to libvo-aacenc. >>> >>> I thought this was the case for several years? >>> >>> Needs a Changelog entry and a news entry together with >>> libaacplus. >> >> how does the speed of all the aac encoders compare ? >> we should keep the fastest and the one havng best quality per bit >> (assuming thats a single one and not multiple due to different behavior >> at different bitrates) >> >> also it may make sense to keep activly developed encoders so users and >> develoeprs can continue to test/compare and use them in case they >> improve >> > > > libvo-aacenc is a dump from an earlier Android build. Android has > since switched to fdk-aac and libvo-aacenc is just dead. > So from that perspective, there is definitely nothing lost. > > Can't judge the speed, but libvo-aacenc has the worst quality of all > aac lc encoders we had, so I doubt anyone is going to miss it.
For some reason this person: https://ffmpeg.zeranoe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1457 Missed it ("it's 4x slower!")... FWIW. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
