On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:24:36AM +0000, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> Kieran Kunhya <kieran <at> kunhya.com> writes: >> >> > The internal encoder is superior to libvo-aacenc. >> >> I thought this was the case for several years? >> >> Needs a Changelog entry and a news entry together with >> libaacplus. > > how does the speed of all the aac encoders compare ? > we should keep the fastest and the one havng best quality per bit > (assuming thats a single one and not multiple due to different behavior > at different bitrates) > > also it may make sense to keep activly developed encoders so users and > develoeprs can continue to test/compare and use them in case they > improve >
libvo-aacenc is a dump from an earlier Android build. Android has since switched to fdk-aac and libvo-aacenc is just dead. So from that perspective, there is definitely nothing lost. Can't judge the speed, but libvo-aacenc has the worst quality of all aac lc encoders we had, so I doubt anyone is going to miss it. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
