On 8 January 2016 at 23:24, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > A global thread pool sounds like an extremely messy and unclean > solution. The state of a library is not supposed to affect anything > else in the same process.
The point of my message was to start a discussion, not to receive immediate answer ridiculing the idea and I have to say by someone who clearly haven't done much work on highly parallelised application, and who fail to even consider the problem. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
