Hi On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 11:38:11PM +0100, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > > > > all members of fflabs where aware of it as i asked about the license > > situation it in the private > > fflabs IRC channel. I asked there because fflabs/jb has a lawyer > > > > Do you understand that the lawyer of FFlabs represents the interests of > FFlabs and does not represent the interests of FFmpeg?
I understand that if i hire a lawyer, he would represent my interrests If i ask SPI (which i did as well), they would represent SPI interrests FFmpeg cannot hire a lawyer. So its easy to complain that it didnt FFlabs depends on FFmpeg so its interrests in terms of FFmpeg complying to all laws should be aligned here And you are at the same level here, you can ask any lawyer you want. thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety -- Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
