> On Jun 1, 2025, at 2:55 PM, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Jun 2025, 20:23 Michael Niedermayer, <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > wrote: > >> Hi James >> >> On Sun, Jun 01, 2025 at 02:27:37PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >>> On 6/1/2025 12:22 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> almpeg is now merged upto 1 months ago. (and since last merge it >> contains >>>> bits of AGPL code) >>>> >>>> The question now is, how does the community want to proceed from here? >>> Full stop. >>> >> >>> Not only you're trying to bypass explicit a license notice on >>> technicalities, >> >> This is a serious accusation. >> > > Changing the licence based on a technicality (that would not stand up in > court) is also a serious step.
It has happened in the past and I don’t think this is a technicality as Compn mentioned :) Changing the license is mandatory. > FFmpeg should get legal advice before doing this and there should be a vote. > > I am astonished how flippantly this is being treated. > Well that’s what the courts are for when there is disagreement. — Baptiste Coudurier _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
