Hi, Le 21 décembre 2024 05:57:26 GMT+02:00, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> a écrit : >Hi Anton > >On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 06:24:46AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: >> Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-12-19 20:52:39) >> > This was a brave decission and IMO it was the correct decission. >> > You saw people fighting, and you stepped between them to stop it. >> >> So what we have here is a server admin approving and encouraging his >> buddy to perform arbitrary censorship > >There was no arbitrary censorship, there was a thread that was for a >few hours moderated. >ffmpeg-devel is for the development of FFmpeg
You're playing with words here. If it wasn't arbitrary, it was both discretionary and outside of mandate and due oversight... which adds up pretty close to arbitrary. It was also manipulative of the election whether or not this was intended. In a normal election, this sort of manipulation of the campaign would lead to a recall and ineligibility of any and all candidates involved in the manipulation. In a typical OSS project, this would also lead to revocation of admin privileges. Just saying. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
