Hi Anton On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 06:24:46AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-12-19 20:52:39) > > This was a brave decission and IMO it was the correct decission. > > You saw people fighting, and you stepped between them to stop it. > > So what we have here is a server admin approving and encouraging his > buddy to perform arbitrary censorship
There was no arbitrary censorship, there was a thread that was for a
few hours moderated.
ffmpeg-devel is for the development of FFmpeg
and one of my mails was rejected too:
Your request to the ffmpeg-devel mailing list
Posting of your message titled "Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE]
upcoming vote: CC election"
has been rejected by the list moderator.
so we are all treated equal here
> with no oversight.
What does that even mean ?
If a discussion goes of the rails and becomes "toxic" the moderator
must step in and take action. At worst a mail is delayed or may need to
be resent (if really a mistake is made).
Iam fairly sure i remember you wanting something to be done about the tone
and lack of friendlyness on the ML years ago.
more so, half of the current CC candidates where involved in fuelling
the previous unfriendly threads. So we cannot even vote for a CC that has
5 members who have not been involved.
> Said buddy was
> granted moderator privileges for no reason anyone can articulate, sees
He is moderator for about as long as FFmpeg existed
[...]
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
There will always be a question for which you do not know the correct answer.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
