Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-12-19 20:52:39) > This was a brave decission and IMO it was the correct decission. > You saw people fighting, and you stepped between them to stop it.
So what we have here is a server admin approving and encouraging his buddy to perform arbitrary censorship with no oversight. Said buddy was granted moderator privileges for no reason anyone can articulate, sees no difference between acting as a moderator and acting as a private person, recently resurfaced after 6+ years of complete absence, and yet apparently feels entirely at liberty to censor whatever he wants. I really hope that makes it clear to everyone why there needs to be a proper process for access to infrastructure, and "just leave everything to Michael" leads exactly to the situation we have now, and all the similar situations we've had in the past. No, Michael, it's not "unfriendly people". It's you. It's always been you. Other projects do not have these problems at such a regular basis. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
