On Wed, Aug 28, 2024, 07:56 Rémi Denis-Courmont <r...@remlab.net> wrote:
> > > Le 28 août 2024 06:29:30 GMT+03:00, Kacper Michajlow <kaspe...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > >On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 09:51, Rémi Denis-Courmont <r...@remlab.net> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Le 27 août 2024 10:00:08 GMT+03:00, Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> a > écrit : > >> > >> >IMHO the patch itself is harmless (simple, easy to follow), and if it > helps somebody (no matter how unupported its use-case is), then why the > hell not. But I can understand your point of view, that we should not > bother with it, if it is unsupported in the first place, so I will just > drop this, did not feel strongly about it anyway. > >> > >> Can't we just fail configure or compilation hard if > __FINITE_MATH_ONLY__ is true? > >> > >> If MPV or whichever downstream wants to get this flag working, it's on > them to do the hard work (and it's a lot harder than this patch). > > > >Whoa, don't call out mpv like that. There are no plans to do any of > >that. > > Don't publicly accuse me of something I did not do. I don't remember who > blamed this code for breaking mpv but it certainly wasn't me. And why the > heck do you make it a problem now rather than then? > I don't know what you did or didn't do; I'm only responding to your mention of mpv in this thread. If I'm missing some context outside this thread, I apologize. I'm simply saying that mpv won't work with the mentioned flags on its own, and I find it unnecessary to mention it as something that would drive a change like that. - Kacper _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
