Le 28 août 2024 06:29:30 GMT+03:00, Kacper Michajlow <kaspe...@gmail.com> a écrit : >On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 09:51, Rémi Denis-Courmont <r...@remlab.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> Le 27 août 2024 10:00:08 GMT+03:00, Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> a écrit : >> >> >IMHO the patch itself is harmless (simple, easy to follow), and if it helps >> >somebody (no matter how unupported its use-case is), then why the hell not. >> >But I can understand your point of view, that we should not bother with it, >> >if it is unsupported in the first place, so I will just drop this, did not >> >feel strongly about it anyway. >> >> Can't we just fail configure or compilation hard if __FINITE_MATH_ONLY__ is >> true? >> >> If MPV or whichever downstream wants to get this flag working, it's on them >> to do the hard work (and it's a lot harder than this patch). > >Whoa, don't call out mpv like that. There are no plans to do any of >that.
Don't publicly accuse me of something I did not do. I don't remember who blamed this code for breaking mpv but it certainly wasn't me. And why the heck do you make it a problem now rather than then? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
