On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 7:39 PM Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 2:53 PM Vittorio Giovara < > vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 2:02 PM Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:59 PM Vittorio Giovara < > > > vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:09 PM Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 9:09 AM Vittorio Giovara < > > > > > vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:55 AM Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:53 AM Vittorio Giovara < > > > > > > > vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 3:01 AM Cosmin Stejerean via > > ffmpeg-devel > > > < > > > > > > > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reposting my question/comment here since Thilo hasn't > had a > > > > > chance > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > respond, but shouldn't these kinds of requests go through > > the > > > > GA? > > > > > > If > > > > > > > > > > anybody can do whatever they want with the ffmpeg name, > > then > > > > > what's > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > point of voting and following the established process? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Probably? I'm not actually sure what the process is for > > getting > > > > an > > > > > > > FFmpeg > > > > > > > > > booth at a conference. Is there a documented process > > somewhere > > > > for > > > > > > how > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > should be done? If not this might be a good opportunity to > > > create > > > > > > one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed, do you have a draft you could share as a base of > > > > discussion? > > > > > > Once > > > > > > > > defined, we could have the GA vote on it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It might also make for a good topic of discussion at VDD. > For > > > how > > > > > > much > > > > > > > > > drama there was about NAB on the list I was surprised there > > was > > > > > zero > > > > > > > > > discussion about it at FOSDEM. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There were probably more important topics to discuss and the > > > > > lingering > > > > > > > hope > > > > > > > > that the problematic points would have been handled better > than > > > by > > > > > > > calling > > > > > > > > people trolls > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the "or you" part, I wasn't involved in securing > > > > > > sponsorship > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > NAB or IBC. I did volunteer to help with NAB because I > happen > > > to > > > > > live > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > Vegas and I enjoy spending time with other ffmpeg > developers. > > > I'm > > > > > > happy > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > help at NAB next year as well should it happen again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Noted, it should have said "or anybody willing to host/help a > > > > booth" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have no plans to attend IBC and no involvement with the > > FFmpeg > > > > > booth > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > IBC. I am merely trying to correct the perception that NAB > > was > > > > > > > > > cost-problematic, since no money was paid by the project > for > > > NAB. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think anybody is suggesting that booths are > > > > cost-problematic, > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > rather they are lacking in process (one shouldn't allowed use > > > > ffmpeg > > > > > > name > > > > > > > > "just because") and in scope (aka "the why" and what kind of > > > > results > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > expected by investing time in said booth) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Said by prominent LibAV developer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reported to CC :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CC is fully controlled by prominent LibAV developers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not only is this factually incorrect, it's also unrelated to the > topic > > at > > > > hand. No worries, this infringement is being reported to the CC as > > well, > > > > but please try to make an effort at doing better at least. > > > > Thank you > > > > > > > > > > Do not trust LibAV developers even when they are giving you gifts. > > > > > > > I'm not giving you anything, please can you stop? I don't want to flood > the > > CC with emails, but I'll do so if that helps stifle this kind of > behavior. > > Please disconnect, grow up, be nicer to your fellow community members, > and > > just do better. > > > > Thank you for your arrogant continuous behavior that match nicely with your > latest code contributions. > I don't think I'm being arrogant when I ask you to stop abusive behavior. Imagine if people responded with "Typical librempeg developer answer" to all of your email, how would you feel about it? > If you stop responding with mails on all FFmpeg mailing lists from now to > indefinite time in future nothing of value would be lost. > Please reread what you wrote and appreciate the irony of the situation. Needless to say, this is also going straight to CC :) Please just do better, I believe in you! -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
