On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 9:09 AM Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:55 AM Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:53 AM Vittorio Giovara < > > vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 3:01 AM Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel < > > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Reposting my question/comment here since Thilo hasn't had a chance > to > > > > > respond, but shouldn't these kinds of requests go through the GA? > If > > > > > anybody can do whatever they want with the ffmpeg name, then what's > > the > > > > > point of voting and following the established process? > > > > > > > > Probably? I'm not actually sure what the process is for getting an > > FFmpeg > > > > booth at a conference. Is there a documented process somewhere for > how > > > this > > > > should be done? If not this might be a good opportunity to create > one. > > > > > > > > > > Agreed, do you have a draft you could share as a base of discussion? > Once > > > defined, we could have the GA vote on it > > > > > > > > > > It might also make for a good topic of discussion at VDD. For how > much > > > > drama there was about NAB on the list I was surprised there was zero > > > > discussion about it at FOSDEM. > > > > > > > > > > There were probably more important topics to discuss and the lingering > > hope > > > that the problematic points would have been handled better than by > > calling > > > people trolls > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the "or you" part, I wasn't involved in securing > sponsorship > > > for > > > > NAB or IBC. I did volunteer to help with NAB because I happen to live > > in > > > > Vegas and I enjoy spending time with other ffmpeg developers. I'm > happy > > > to > > > > help at NAB next year as well should it happen again. > > > > > > > > > > Noted, it should have said "or anybody willing to host/help a booth" > > > > > > I have no plans to attend IBC and no involvement with the FFmpeg booth > at > > > > IBC. I am merely trying to correct the perception that NAB was > > > > cost-problematic, since no money was paid by the project for NAB. > > > > > > > > > > I don't think anybody is suggesting that booths are cost-problematic, > but > > > rather they are lacking in process (one shouldn't allowed use ffmpeg > name > > > "just because") and in scope (aka "the why" and what kind of results > are > > > expected by investing time in said booth) > > > > > > > Said by prominent LibAV developer. > > > > reported to CC :) > CC is fully controlled by prominent LibAV developers. > -- > Vittorio > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
