> On Jun 3, 2024, at 3:58 PM, Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 10:57 PM Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel < > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > >> >> >>> On Jun 3, 2024, at 12:26 PM, Rémi Denis-Courmont <r...@remlab.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> Le maanantaina 3. kesäkuuta 2024, 21.58.48 EEST Cosmin Stejerean via >> ffmpeg- >>> devel a écrit : >>>> Not sure why you keep beating this dead horse. >>> >>> Err, I think that it is obvious why: >>> >>> 1) The questions were not answered back then. Calling the people asking >>> questions troll is not answering, it's insulting. >>> >>> 2) IBC came up today, in much the same way as NAB did. >> >> The costs or lack thereof came up today. Making accusations that it was >> FFmpeg in name only did not come up until you brought it up, and seems >> completely uncalled for. >> > > Reposting my question/comment here since Thilo hasn't had a chance to > respond, but shouldn't these kinds of requests go through the GA? If > anybody can do whatever they want with the ffmpeg name, then what's the > point of voting and following the established process? >
Probably? I'm not actually sure what the process is for getting an FFmpeg booth at a conference. Is there a documented process somewhere for how this should be done? If not this might be a good opportunity to create one. It might also make for a good topic of discussion at VDD. For how much drama there was about NAB on the list I was surprised there was zero discussion about it at FOSDEM. > I think this is the underlying problem with booth management, everybody > acts like they own the place, and nothing changes from one event to > another, instead of taking notes to improve the situation. For example : > thilo or you sending a note to the GA "hey i got sponsorship for > IBC/NAB/whatever, I plan to represent ffmpeg, and have a b c as objectives. > Is that cool with you all? If yes, can we host GPAC and other multimedia > foss projects?" would have avoided a lot of drama. No disagreements from me, I do think that might have avoided a lot of drama. Regarding the "or you" part, I wasn't involved in securing sponsorship for NAB or IBC. I did volunteer to help with NAB because I happen to live in Vegas and I enjoy spending time with other ffmpeg developers. I'm happy to help at NAB next year as well should it happen again. I have no plans to attend IBC and no involvement with the FFmpeg booth at IBC. I am merely trying to correct the perception that NAB was cost-problematic, since no money was paid by the project for NAB. - Cosmin _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".