On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:13 PM Kyle Swanson <k...@ylo.ph> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 2:37 AM Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Keeping old code will not make patch any prettier. > > It's not really about pretty, it's about splitting up the patch so we > can do things one at a time. I think the change to use f_ebur128.c > loudness computation might have some advantages, but I can't test them > in isolation. The changes to the loudnorm algorithm I have more > questions about, but I can't test those in isolation either. >
Define what isolation means for you? You all are just allowing poor code state and quality stay. > > Thanks, > Kyle > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
