On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 8:39 PM Kyle Swanson <k...@ylo.ph> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 6:11 AM Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I tested this a lot, and its great move forward. > > > > Make more useful testing and review next time, I'm sure you are quite > > capable person. > > Paul, I agree with Anton. Refactoring the code (i.e. changing filter > behavior) and combining it with f_ebur128.c all at once makes the diff > very hard to review. I suggest an incremental approach, let's address > the issues you've identified with the loudnorm filter one by one, and > then a second stage where we see about combining with f_ebur128.c. >
Loudnorm filter is big pile of hacks, I wanted to move forward and I improved it. I received nothing in return just some politics talks. I will apply this soon unless technical comments arise. Why would I spend on this more my precious time? For no real gain as I will again receive nothing in return except some useless comment and no single technical aspect. > > Thanks, > Kyle > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
