On 28.11.23 21:30, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
On 11/28/2023 3:50 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Calling things generically bad is the opposite of helpful.
I cannot offer help on making a paragraph that I don't fully
understand become more comprehensible, as that would require
I understand it fully.
But, I would again like to state these votes should be scrapped
and redone. People literally voted the opposite of what they wanted
to by accident, due to this.
FWIW the type in of weights is one of the two options to do a
proportional representation for the vote.
The other is the one we had used so far, by ranking the candidates from
1st to n-th.
Both should serve our needs for proportional representation AFAICT and I
don't assume they'd give us different results of the vote. But maybe
Anton had a reason to pick one over the other.
If Anton decides it's worth redoing it, we maybe just do the other
option and be a bit more resilient to misinterpretation.
-Thilo
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
