On Sat, 02 Dec 2023 11:24:39 +0100 Anton Khirnov <an...@khirnov.net> wrote: > So, given that we've had no further reports about voting mistakes, I'm > leaning towards NOT redoing the vote. If anyone has strong opinions one > way or another, feel welcome to comment. Either way we should make a > decision before the vote is closed on Tuesday.
One wrong vote out of 51 eligible is an error rate substantially below the average for any kind of vote, ever. I would assume this has a lower impact on the overall results than other sources of noise (mood, weather, recent events, ...), and certainly less error than trying to re-do the vote would introduce. Also, if we now start to question a vote's validity over such minor inconsistensies, after all the recent vote drama, we will begin to set a rather nasty precedent for how future votes should be treated. Finally, remember that human beings make mistakes and can misread even the most basic of instructions. That somebody voted incorrectly is neither fault of the explanation nor of the person voting, and IMO bikeshedding how many ways to rephrase "higher number = more good" is not a productive use of anybody's time. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
