On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 3:10 PM Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/28/2023 1:23 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > The system will assume you want to maximise the sum of weights of > > selected candidates. E.g. if X is given a weight of 10 and Y and Z have > > weights 8 and 6 respectively, then the voting algorithm will assume you > > prefer a committee with both Y and Z over one with X, because 14 > 10. > > However, giving Y and Z weight of 4 and 2 instead would have expressed > > that X is preferred to a combination of Y and Z, because 6 < 10. > > This is the opposite of clear or concise, it is word soup. > > Given that some already voted the opposite of what they intende, and > this trainwreck of an explanation, I think these votes should be > nuked. > > Really. I *still* have trouble understanding what to enter even after > reading this. > > What drugs were the devs on when they thought "yes, having voters enter > free-form data is reasonable"? > Looks like average IQ dropped bellow room temperature. > > - Derek > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
