Le decadi 20 messidor, an CCXXIII, Marton Balint a écrit : > I'd still use the metadata directive. If someone needs per-stream, or > per-packet metadata, he can implement selector directives for that. Like > metadata_stream or metadata_interval which will change the scope of the > following metadata directives. > > How about that?
I am still uneasy about that. Selectors feel like making the parser more complex, and also there is the issue of self-documentation. When someone reads a concat script and see "metadata foo=bar", unless they already know exactly the directive, they will take a guess at what it does, and since packet metadata is rare, especially packet metadata that is duplicated over all the packets, they will probably not guess right. I really think a more specific name would be useful. This is an usability issue, though, so my role as maintainer is not very important: let us ear advice from other people. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
