L'octidi 18 messidor, an CCXXIII, Marton Balint a écrit :
> Yeah, i know. Actually I don't see how would it be possible to give a
> stronger kind of guarantee efficiently and reliably to the user. That is why

I suppose this could be done by discarding the packets beyond outpoint until
either all streams have had one or one packets exceeds outpoint+epsilon. But
that makes the code more complex, and there still is the issue of B-frames.

> I sticked to the simplest-to-implement method. For the moment - if the user
> will use this directive to cut parts in an interleaved video, he should know
> his interleaving delays (and his GOP sizes :))

I suppose it can do with the proper documentation.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to