On Sunday 28 June 2015 04:54:02 pm Nicolas George wrote: > Second, someone actually took efforts to do so, I take it as > a sign that it was considered useful by someone knowing the > issue better than me.
This argument surprises me (very much)! Over the last four years, I had a completely different impression. > Third, a quick glance seems to indicate that the new code > is cleaner than the old one This argument does not just make me sad, I was hoping very much that nobody would ever use it in such a context on this mailing list. =-( In my other mails were two minor examples for reasons why I can hardly believe the code was reviewed (or tested). Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
