Le decadi 10 messidor, an CCXXIII, Carl Eugen Hoyos a écrit : > From a very quick look, the new code seems mostly > unreviewed
What makes you say that? Where did you give your "very quick look" exactly? > Do you disagree? I do disagree, on several counts. First, the old muxer was based on reverse-engineering, the new one is based on the spec; in principle, i.e. except when the spec is actually crap, this is better. Second, someone actually took efforts to do so, I take it as a sign that it was considered useful by someone knowing the issue better than me. Third, a quick glance seems to indicate that the new code is cleaner than the old one, I could spot an unchecked av_dict_set() immediately for example. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
