On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 12:10, Dawid Kozinski/Multimedia (PLT) /SRPOL/Staff Engineer/Samsung Electronics <d.kozin...@samsung.com> wrote:
> > At the moment, it doesn't matter to us whether there are two lists or one. > What matters to us is pushing our patchset containing an EVC codec wrapper > to ffmpeg. We want to refine and maintain this code and have the > information > somewhere about who is responsible for it (EVC) and who to contact with > questions. We hope that our patchset will eventually be accepted, and we > will then apply for write access to Git because we want to take care of the > EVC code. > I appreciate your sincerity but history shows that patches to third-party libs from corporate contributors are not maintained (as Ronald said). People change jobs, work focus changes etc etc. A good example of this is libyami. Even more so for EVC which has had very limited uptake. Regards, Kieran Kunhya _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
