Jan 29, 2023, 10:57 by mich...@niedermayer.cc: > Hi > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 01:03:00PM +0100, Dawid Kozinski/Multimedia (PLT) > /SRPOL/Staff Engineer/Samsung Electronics wrote: > >> Hi, >> It's been almost a month since we submitted our latest changes to the FFmpeg >> patchwork. I know that EVC implementation isn't the only thing you are >> working on at the moment but we'd like to do another step forward, toward >> merging our implementation into the master branch of the FFmpeg repository. >> The contribution is something that we take seriously so we'd like to finally >> do some progress. >> We would like to merge it as soon as it is enough good and it meets the >> expected quality. Continual synchronization of our changes with the latest >> FFmpeg changes and splitting our changes into patches is, let's say a >> painstaking job. It would be much easier to develop and refine the code if >> we could skip that hard splitting on patches step that we have to do each >> time we do any, even small change. >> We know that the new FFmpeg version will be released soon and you may be >> absorbed and overwhelmed with the work related to the new release. However, >> we'd be grateful if you found a little time and take a look at our latest >> changes. >> Last but not least. Do you have any plans related to including such changes >> as our EVC implementation in the next release? >> > > I cannot speak for others but ATM for me its difficult to add this patchset > to my > todo list. If someone reviews and applies it it could make it in for the > release > but will anyone, i do not know. > What i can say is that if a patch which adds you to MAINTAINERS is applied > ping me > and ill give you git write (unless there are some new standing objections), > and once you have that you can work on this code with less pain. > But i will leave applying the MAINTAINERS change to others too > as some people seemed not happy anout it and i think in such case its better > if a 2nd > developer does that > > PS: Maybe you can troll the people who didnt like your MAINTAINERS addition > into > reviewing & applying your patchset. Its not an unreasonable request because if > you dont have git write someone else has to apply changes >
I assign myself to personally review the patchset and push it, if you review my policy change on maintainership. As I said, I have no objection on who gets maintainership, just that it is done explicitly via a separate list in the maintainers file. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
