Le ven. 1 juil. 2022, 10:08, Matthieu Bouron <matthieu.bou...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 5:35 PM Michael Niedermayer < > mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 04:11:10PM +0200, Matthieu Bouron wrote: >> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:13 PM Michael Niedermayer < >> mich...@niedermayer.cc> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 10:33:37PM +0200, Matthieu Bouron wrote: >> > > > --- >> > > > libswscale/input.c | 1 + >> > > > libswscale/utils.c | 1 + >> > > > libswscale/version.h | 2 +- >> > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixdesc-nv16 | 1 + >> > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-copy | 1 + >> > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-crop | 1 + >> > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-field | 1 + >> > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-fieldorder | 1 + >> > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-hflip | 1 + >> > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-il | 1 + >> > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-null | 1 + >> > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-pad | 1 + >> > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-scale | 1 + >> > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-vflip | 1 + >> > > > 14 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > > > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-pixdesc-nv16 >> > > >> > > >> > Sorry for the late reply >> > >> > >> > > has this been tested ? (various scaled and non scaled) variants ? >> > > >> > >> > I only tested the non scaled variant using the command line doing >> multiple >> > round trips to/from nv16. >> > Is there a particular test procedure to validate every variants ? >> >> you can test manually or use something like >> libswscale/tests/swscale.c >> > > I manually tested without any issue: il, field, fieldorder, copy, crop, > hflip, null, pad, scale and vflip. > Ping. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
