On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 5:35 PM Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 04:11:10PM +0200, Matthieu Bouron wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:13 PM Michael Niedermayer < > mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 10:33:37PM +0200, Matthieu Bouron wrote: > > > > --- > > > > libswscale/input.c | 1 + > > > > libswscale/utils.c | 1 + > > > > libswscale/version.h | 2 +- > > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixdesc-nv16 | 1 + > > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-copy | 1 + > > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-crop | 1 + > > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-field | 1 + > > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-fieldorder | 1 + > > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-hflip | 1 + > > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-il | 1 + > > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-null | 1 + > > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-pad | 1 + > > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-scale | 1 + > > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-vflip | 1 + > > > > 14 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-pixdesc-nv16 > > > > > > > > Sorry for the late reply > > > > > > > has this been tested ? (various scaled and non scaled) variants ? > > > > > > > I only tested the non scaled variant using the command line doing > multiple > > round trips to/from nv16. > > Is there a particular test procedure to validate every variants ? > > you can test manually or use something like > libswscale/tests/swscale.c > I manually tested without any issue: il, field, fieldorder, copy, crop, hflip, null, pad, scale and vflip. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
