On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:13 PM Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 10:33:37PM +0200, Matthieu Bouron wrote: > > --- > > libswscale/input.c | 1 + > > libswscale/utils.c | 1 + > > libswscale/version.h | 2 +- > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixdesc-nv16 | 1 + > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-copy | 1 + > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-crop | 1 + > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-field | 1 + > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-fieldorder | 1 + > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-hflip | 1 + > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-il | 1 + > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-null | 1 + > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-pad | 1 + > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-scale | 1 + > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-vflip | 1 + > > 14 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-pixdesc-nv16 > > Sorry for the late reply > has this been tested ? (various scaled and non scaled) variants ? > I only tested the non scaled variant using the command line doing multiple round trips to/from nv16. Is there a particular test procedure to validate every variants ? [...] _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
