Quoting Gyan Doshi (2021-04-11 13:12:47) > > > On 2021-04-11 16:30, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting Gyan Doshi (2021-04-11 12:52:18) > >> > >> On 2021-04-11 15:27, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >>> Am So., 11. Apr. 2021 um 08:41 Uhr schrieb Gyan Doshi <g...@videolan.org>: > >>>> ffmpeg | branch: master | Gyan Doshi <ffm...@gyani.pro> | Sat Apr 10 > >>>> 16:35:53 2021 +0530| [47b8871ca6f9da4c0467466a43d204dec7fcbd4a] | > >>>> committer: Gyan Doshi > >>>> > >>>> doc/muxers: add entries for raw muxers > >>> Is this really an improvement of our documentation? > >> Yes, the aim is to attain complete coverage. > > Why? Empty documentation is useless. Useless documentation is worse than > > no documentation, because it wastes your time. > > The document registers their existence and allows someone to discover > their presence via web search. Most non-devs don't do `ffmpeg -muxers`.
Why would non-devs need that information? > > - will get out of date quickly > > These elements change very slowly - there's hardly anything to change. And no way to know which entries are outdate other than manually checking them one by one. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
