On 2021-04-11 16:30, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2021-04-11 12:52:18)
On 2021-04-11 15:27, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 11. Apr. 2021 um 08:41 Uhr schrieb Gyan Doshi <g...@videolan.org>:
ffmpeg | branch: master | Gyan Doshi <ffm...@gyani.pro> | Sat Apr 10 16:35:53
2021 +0530| [47b8871ca6f9da4c0467466a43d204dec7fcbd4a] | committer: Gyan Doshi
doc/muxers: add entries for raw muxers
Is this really an improvement of our documentation?
Yes, the aim is to attain complete coverage.
Why? Empty documentation is useless. Useless documentation is worse than
no documentation, because it wastes your time.
The document registers their existence and allows someone to discover
their presence via web search. Most non-devs don't do `ffmpeg -muxers`.
Also, a lot of that information looks like it
- could be auto-generated
Most of it, yes. Till (and if) we have that in place, this will do.
- will get out of date quickly
These elements change very slowly - there's hardly anything to change.
Regards,
Gyan
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
