On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 7:48 PM Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 7:18 PM Max Dmitrichenko <maxim....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 3:18 PM Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 2:11 PM Max Dmitrichenko <maxim....@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Question about array-textures: are there any confirmation that with > any > > > > BindFlags combination it is should be possible to create such > texture? > > > > Most importantly D3D11_BIND_RENDER_TARGET. > > > > > > > > > > More interestingly, is there any evidence that this is in fact not > > > possible? > > > I see no mention of any limitations like that in the D3D11 > documentation. > > > > > > Where does this condition then come from? > > > > > > > > MSFT documentation is not share much details, > > Try following https://pastebin.com/iCPrwUem > > see #if condition for easy check > > > > Did you ever try reducing the number of bind flags? > Flagging it both for decoder and renderer usage at the same time seems > slightly overkill to me, afterall only one of those processes is going > to fill the texture, and you could (and maybe should) use a different > pool if you want renderer target textures, for eg. filtering? > > both flags: D3D11_BIND_DECODER ( output from the decoder API ) and D3D11_BIND_VIDEO_ENCODER (input from the video encoder API) work fine for ArraySize > 1 / array-textures where more complex cases , like with D3D11_BIND_RENDER_TARGET seems to be gap with one texture in AVHWFramesContext, unless we have several AVHWFramesContext, is this a case? regards Max _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
