On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 05:41:41PM +0100, Robert Krüger wrote: > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> > wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > its a while since FFmpeg 2.5, so its getting time to make 2.6 > > if you want something in it or something fixed, now is your last > > chance ;) > > > > About the name if noone suggests something then ill pick a random > > scientist from the list i have from past suggestions > > > > > Since it not having been part of a release was an argument for allowing to > break API to fix the default for writing the colr atom (which a number of > people found more sensible), it would be nice to have that in before, > because otherwise that argument would no longer hold after 2.6 is out, > resulting in a rather bad situation with both options in there for a while.
> How much time would there be to submit a patch that changes the default? there is no strict cast in stone release date, so i do not know i wanted to do the release soon, i do not know if that will work out there are still some things i wanted to test which may delay things but if things are all working and tested we might release tomorrow or it might be in a week, i dont know [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Let us carefully observe those good qualities wherein our enemies excel us and endeavor to excel them, by avoiding what is faulty, and imitating what is excellent in them. -- Plutarch
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
