On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 10:17:15PM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: > On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 05:53:59PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi all > > > > its a while since FFmpeg 2.5, so its getting time to make 2.6 > > if you want something in it or something fixed, now is your last > > chance ;) > > > > About the name if noone suggests something then ill pick a random > > scientist from the list i have from past suggestions > > > > I might help writing the RELEASE_NOTES. Anything not present in the
thanks! > Changelog that I should mention? Particular optimizations, area where a > large amount of fixes happened (and are not going to be backported), OPW, > or other various project changes? if i knew something i would have added it to the Changelog probably so i cant think of anything but iam sure forgetting somthing ... > > BTW, do we want to encourage occasional contributors and companies to > contribute more by mentioning them in a thanks section? Quickly skimming > through the history I see NVIDIA, Samsung, Collabora, ... What do people > think? See the bottom of http://i3wm.org/downloads/RELEASE-NOTES-4.9.txt > for an example (yeah I know it's not the first time I pick that same > model). sure, possible [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
