On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 05:53:59PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > its a while since FFmpeg 2.5, so its getting time to make 2.6 > if you want something in it or something fixed, now is your last > chance ;) > > About the name if noone suggests something then ill pick a random > scientist from the list i have from past suggestions >
I might help writing the RELEASE_NOTES. Anything not present in the Changelog that I should mention? Particular optimizations, area where a large amount of fixes happened (and are not going to be backported), OPW, or other various project changes? BTW, do we want to encourage occasional contributors and companies to contribute more by mentioning them in a thanks section? Quickly skimming through the history I see NVIDIA, Samsung, Collabora, ... What do people think? See the bottom of http://i3wm.org/downloads/RELEASE-NOTES-4.9.txt for an example (yeah I know it's not the first time I pick that same model). Last thing, anyone to have a look to FATE and see if something is relevant for fixing before the release? I see that hevc still seems to fail a test with threading for instance. Don't we want to get this fixed before the release? -- Clément B.
pgp9WH1UeYAay.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
