On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Stefano Sabatini <stefa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On date Thursday 2015-01-29 03:46:42 +0530, Arwa Arif encoded: > > I have updated the page with new images. > > http://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Postprocessing > > Note: probably you can improve the page layout by stripping the black > top and bottom bands in the matrix reference. > > How do you exactly created the query image? Also please specify the > information unit (200K = 200 Kbit/s, right?) > > I used this command to create the query image: ffmpeg -i matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg -b:v 200k matrixbench_mpeg2-lq.mpg > > What exactly needs to be done in benchmark section? > > I already suggested a command (please keep some context when > replying), but Michael observed that the actual benchmark could be > affected by I/O speed. > > I wonder if there is a better way to benchmark the performance of a > single filter. Using START/STOP_TIMER can be an idea but it would be > probably a little awkward. > So, which method should I follow to get the runtime? > -- > FFmpeg = Forgiving and Forgiving Murdering Picky Excellent Gorilla > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
