On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:42:03AM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > On date Tuesday 2015-01-20 22:34:15 +0530, Arwa Arif encoded: > > > > > > Still missing benchmarks and pp filter covering. > > > > > > > > > What is meant by pp filter covering? > > I mean that there are no images obtained by applying pp (and uspp as > well). > > > Do you want benchmark for each image? And by benchmark you mean runtime, > > right? > > No, I think you should use a complete video as benchmark. You can show > the values in a separate dedicated section. For example you could use > a low-quality matrix_bench.mpg. > > For example: > ffmpeg -i matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg -b:v 200k matrixbench_mpeg2-lq.mpg >
> ffmpeg -i matrixbench_mpeg2-lq.mpg -an -c:v rawvideo > matrixbench_mpeg2-lq.rawvideo.nut > (the output is 2.8GiB here) > > ffmpeg -benchmark -i matrixbench_mpeg2-lq.rawvideo.nut -vf PP -f null - this could end up being limited by disk speed and not *pp [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The real ebay dictionary, page 3 "Rare item" - "Common item with rare defect or maybe just a lie" "Professional" - "'Toy' made in china, not functional except as doorstop" "Experts will know" - "The seller hopes you are not an expert"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
