On date Tuesday 2015-01-20 22:34:15 +0530, Arwa Arif encoded: > > > > Still missing benchmarks and pp filter covering. > > > >
> What is meant by pp filter covering? I mean that there are no images obtained by applying pp (and uspp as well). > Do you want benchmark for each image? And by benchmark you mean runtime, > right? No, I think you should use a complete video as benchmark. You can show the values in a separate dedicated section. For example you could use a low-quality matrix_bench.mpg. For example: ffmpeg -i matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg -b:v 200k matrixbench_mpeg2-lq.mpg ffmpeg -i matrixbench_mpeg2-lq.mpg -an -c:v rawvideo matrixbench_mpeg2-lq.rawvideo.nut (the output is 2.8GiB here) ffmpeg -benchmark -i matrixbench_mpeg2-lq.rawvideo.nut -vf PP -f null - You should automate the lattest step, so that you run the command with all the PP commands you want to test and automatically extract the benchmark times. -- FFmpeg = Funny and Freak Monstrous Problematic Extended Geisha _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
