On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:43:16 -0300 James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22/01/15 4:27 PM, wm4 wrote: > > Then I'd definitely vote for remove. > > > > The asm probably mattered on ancient CPUs and ancient compilers, but > > there's no reason to keep it anymore. > > No. If the handwritten asm is better than the C code, even if slightly, then > it should not be removed. > And if someone dislikes its inline asm nature then they are free to port it, > like i did with a couple other filters before. For such a small difference, your statement is ridiculous. No, really. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
