On 22/01/15 6:29 AM, wm4 wrote: > IMO the asm shouldn't be added at all. It's not important enough for a > ported video filter, but has high maintenance overhead - there's a > reason the FFmpeg loathes inline asm, right?
Unless the asm is slower than the C code as compiled by recent versions of gcc, or its output not bitexact to the C version while at the same time looking worse, then i see no reason to remove it. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
