On 1/21/15, arwa arif <arwaarif1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I still expect that eq and eq2 should have the same performances, >> since the adjust callback is set depending on the parameter values. So >> we should have a single eq filter. >> >> Please investigate about why you get different benchmark values. >> > > I used this command: ffmpeg -benchmark -i matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg -vf mp=eq2 > -f null - > And everytime I am running this command, I am getting a different result > even for the same input and same filter. > > So, I tried using the time.h library for getting the time, the results for > eq and eq2 are 37.71 and 35.56 seconds respectively. > > I don't know why eq is coming out to be slower than eq2. (In fact, eq2 is > accessing more functions than eq).
Just remove eq code and rename eq2 to eq. > > >> -- >> FFmpeg = Fancy Fancy Multipurpose Pacific Elitist Game >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
